Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] heart rate monitor query - Truman Prevatt

Karen wrote:


 More importantly, do
they interfere with one's ability to pay attention to the actual horse
instead of the monitor?

They sure can, and can cause undue worry for no reason at all.

Amen to that. Back in the mid '90 when HRM's became the new fashion statement in endurance riding - I found that I was much better off to not even turn mine on at a ride for the first loop on the mare. I'd pass out if I did. After the first loop it was fine to use. However, I never saw much a reason to use it on a ride (used mostly in training) since we normally remove the tack at checks in the SE and by the time I removed the tack she was normally down.

On the Jbird, the blasted things just don't work well. Well they will work if you find the sweet spot which is no bigger than the bloody electrode on the girth. If you don't put that electrode almost under him on the girth - it reads 170 on a slow trot, medium trot, canter and gallop. His motion imparts a secondary modulation - I think Roger has addressed this from time to time. It's basically worthless - except at a walk on the Jbird.

What I find more useful is my heart belt. I can rip off the saddle and put it on him (or her when I was riding her) and monitor the heart rate throughout the check. I can glance over and see how they are recovering during the hold. I could of course do that with a stethoscope but it's easier with the monitor. That allows me to spot in issue that might be arising because he is still 60 at 30 minutes in the hold when he should be steadily falling. The hand held units also work well for that.

The other thing I can tell you from checking many a horse in a pulse box is - you can miss a lot of things with an HRM. I've seen horses that had a unrhythmic pulse - that is a nice beat follow by a few fast beats. The HRM will normally "average" through that - many times giving a false reading compared to a stethoscope. I quickly learned which horses to check with stethoscope - there are other indicators.

HRM - Good tool - yes, essential tool - no.

Truman

--
"Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by fighting back

"Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by fighting back."  - Paul Erdos

 


Replies
[RC] heart rate monitor query, Karen