Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] Exempts private property, military lands and all plant lifefrom ES - Maureen A. Fager
Barbara,
You miss the point me-thinks. The issue, for the users of public lands, is
that this will allow land to be developed that will close off access to
public lands. I really care less about your neigbors ugly house, I do care
about developments that close off trail heads and other access my public
lands. I do care about developments that bring so many people to one
location that the public land available becomes so stressed from over use
that it is closed or restricted by it's land managers (as happened to me in
Colorado) I do care about developers who lie about keeping trails and trail
heads open--but do not, as happened to me in Reno.
The issue becomes public land with no access due to developement next to or
around the land and it's access points--that is what legislation like this
can and will bring.
So, how do equestrian trail users deal with this??
That is the issue to me.
Happy Trails,
Maureen
Reno, NV
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large
and By Laws Elections.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
|
