Re: [RC] Minimum speed training - AprJhn
I wasn't trying to point out to anybody that they haven't gone as far or
as fast as they thought and I'm sorry if I did that or implied that or
anything like that. Just airing my own grapplings with the topic.
We are doing some interval training, but steady is much more preferrable
to me than spurting. So I'm basing my training on a steady pace, not a
pace with bursts of speed. And I'm not saying at ALL that that's the
ONLY or the BEST way to train. Just my way. And I'll never get the 100s
of miles in one season that others get simply because of time and the
shortage of multi-days in the Southeast (since I don't do Saturday rides).
And just for the record, I haven't been trying to follow the
recommended MPH training schedule. I am just trying to train my boys to
go at least the minimum speed necessary to complete.
So, consider a 50 miler with 3 vet checks. I have 12 hours to complete,
from start to finish including all vet checks and holds. If each vet
check has a hold time of 40 minutes (starting to sound like a 4th grade
math problem, isn't it ;)) and I estimate it will take 5 minutes at each
check to pulse down, my total allowed ride time is 12 hours minus the 2
hours 15 minutes taken to pulse down and have a hold at each check.
Total ride time is 9 hours 45 minutes. 50 miles divided by 9.75 hours
comes out to a 5.13 mph steady pace. (Please note, these numbers are
fictional and may vary for your ride.)
I need to get my boys to do a steady pace of 5.13 mph for an extended
period of time (whether we trot at 5.13 mph the WHOLE time, or walk some
and throw in some cantering doesn't really matter...what matters is the
average speed over time). Anyway, if I can't train them safely to that,
how can I expect them to do it for 50 miles if they can't do it for 25
or 30 miles in training?
April
Nashville, TN
Ps. if you wonder why I'm posting so much, it's because I'm sick and
have nothing else to do but analyze my training metrics. :)
Karen wrote:
It sounds like you've got it figured out, April. :-)
Once you ride enough, you'll be able to get a good grasp of what your
overall average speed is and how far you've gone based upon that
knowledge. I find it's usually best not to point out to people that
they haven't gone as far (or as fast) as they think they have, they
kinda get annoyed when you do that <g>.
Happy Trails,
Karen
in NV
P.S. and if you read the AERC riders handbook, you'll realize that
it's probably not a good idea to try to follow the recommended MPH
training schedule. :>) (btw, neither of my 5000 mile horses have yet
met the first 0-90 day training recommendations, I just can't seem to
get it figured out......lol)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws
Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Replies
-
- Re: [RC] GPS Distance Accuracy with Hills (long), Karen
|
|