<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] January 2002 European Chef d'Equipe Resolutions for FEI
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:35:57 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] virus
  • - JUDYK89
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Vet checks
  • - Karen

    Re: [RC] January 2002 European Chef d'Equipe Resolutions for FEI - Heidi Smith


    > This was actually an attempt by the European group to provide some sort of
    > control over how FEI events were run. I don't know the specifics of the
    > issues and discussions over the number of vet gates, but most of these
    > measures were intended to provide more consistency (course designer, lack
    of
    > 'secrecy' when taking horse's pulses, etc.)
    
    I fail to see where limiting the number of vet gates has any relevancy to
    problems of "secrecy" in taking horses' pulses.  We ran 7 vet gates at the
    PAC in 1997, Vermont ran a like number last year, the number was openly
    advertised up front for both events, as well as for other events who have
    had similar numbers of vet gates.  As to "secrecy"--at every international
    event I've attended, the mehodology for taking pulses was spelled out in
    advance, and was adhered to.  Increasing technology makes the public
    awareness of pulses increasingly possible, and THAT is how to address
    problems of secrecy--not limiting numbers of holds.
    
    >There may have been other agendas
    > such as shorter competition time (media friendly) but mostly this was a
    > result of frustrations over the way rides had been run in the past.
    >
    > Dane's reference to the veterinarians at the WEC being 'over-ruled' by the
    > Toulouse Group regarding vet gates suggests that this resolution was
    pretty
    > powerful.
    
    First of all, others have suggested that they'd like to know just who the
    "Toulouse Group" is, and I'd like to add my own curiosity to that
    number--WHO are they, and why are they powerful?  Furthermore, I hope the
    "powers that be" who want the sport to be "media friendly" find out in a
    hurry that having dead horses is NOT "media friendly" and that compromising
    in the area of looking after the welfare of the horses will come back to
    bite them on the proverbial backside, if media interest is what they are
    after.
    
    Heidi
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws 
     Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    RE: [RC] January 2002 European Chef d'Equipe Resolutions for FEI, Steph Teeter