<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: RE: [RC] Rule Changes
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:32:33 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] proposed changes in 3 day events sanctioning
  • - Michael Maul
  • Prev by Date: RE: [RC] Rule Changes
  • - Steph Teeter

    RE: [RC] Rule Changes - Bob Morris


    A quick check shows that this was the way it was written in 1990 (1990 AERC Rules and Regulations) and I am sure that is the way it was written when we codified the AERC Rules and Regulations. I have a very old copy, on fanfold dot matrix printed, That was used for the original proposal for codification.
     
    Bob
     

    Bob Morris
    Morris Endurance Enterprises
    Boise, ID

    -----Original Message-----
    From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steph Teeter
    Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 3:07 PM
    To: Annie George; heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Cc: RideCamp
    Subject: RE: [RC] Rule Changes

    Correct. Currently the rule reads:
     
    11.2 Special event rides are series of rides on consecutive days, totaling more than three days or 150 miles. Special Qualification rides are rides with entry qualifications other than those contained in rule #3. Special event and special qualification rides shall require approval of the AERC Board of Directors for sanction for the first two years. 
     
    I've heard several reasons for wanting to change it to include 3-day (150 mile) rides as special events, including consistency between Pioneer points and special event rides, but I am personally (my opinion only) not in favor of the proposed rule change - for many other reasons. I'd leave it the way it is.
     
    Steph (director hat on)
    -----Original Message-----
    From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Annie George
    Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:53 PM
    To: heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Cc: RideCamp
    Subject: Re: [RC] Rule Changes

    I just looked in the book, it says MORE than 3 days are special event. The way I understand the proposed change is that it would make 3 day rides special events and subject to board approval.  Thus my objection to that change. Rite, Steph??? Annie G.
     Anne George Saddlery   www.vtc.net/~ageorge  
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:33 PM
    Subject: Re: [RC] Rule Changes

    > I think we all need to pay very close attention to the proposed rule
    > change regarding the way 3 day rides are sanctioned. Moving it from the
    > Regional Sanctioning Director,  to a board decision on sanctioning for
    > the first 2 years. I feel it will limit our choices, and restrict the
    > regions Sanctioning Directors in an unequal manor. There is no reason
    > to change this. I am concerned that a few will end up controlling not
    > only the rides in their area, but all other neighboring areas as well.
    > If this concerns you, please e/mail the board and tell them to leave it
    > as it is.

    Uh, when did this change to being in the purvey of the regional
    sanctioning director?  If memory serves (and granted I'm not going back
    and looking this up), three-day rides have traditionally been special
    events like longer multi-days, and have always been under the jurisdiction
    of the special sanctioning director--which included board approval for the
    first two years....
    Heidi


    Replies
    RE: [RC] Rule Changes, Steph Teeter