|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
RideCamp@endurance.net
Re: RC: Re: SUVs - IMO
yeah, I guess I should not have put the Explorer in
there. I was just going by SUVs built on truck
chassis. I'm a pick-up man personally, so you
probably won't see me pulling my horses with an SUV.
Besides, my dogs ride better in the bed with a cap
than they would an SUV;)
Tim
--- Deanna German <finishis2win@columbus.rr.com>
wrote:
> >Tim says:
> >Most SUVs are nothing morethan trucks with a
> different body.
> >Take the Fords for instance, Expedition=F150,
> Excursion=F250, and I
> >believe Explorer=Ranger. Chevy I'm sure is the
> same
> >way. Jeep GC's are nice with the V8, but
> personally I
> >like more room and a longer wheelbase. ..... But
> the more
> >popular American made models from Ford and Chevy
> would
> >definitely do the job since they are "truck based"
> >SUVs.
>
> I wouldn't pull any trailer (even a Brenderup) with
> an Explorer!! No way, no
> how.... Not big enough engine, not heavy duty enough
> components. A Ranger?
> Do you realize how puny the engines are in a Ranger?
>
> You're right, the Expedition and Excursion are
> suburban abominations.... oh,
> excuse me, wrong tangent.... they are SUV's on the
> truck chassis and
> generally have the same tow packages, engines and
> drive train options as the
> truck series.
>
> BUT....
>
> I just don't understand why anyone would buy an SUV
> for hauling and towing
> when trucks now come with extended cabs and rear
> seats.
>
> Deanna
>
>
>
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net,
> http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer:
> http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
|
    Check it Out!    
|
|
Home
Events
Groups
Rider Directory
Market
RideCamp
Stuff
Back to TOC