<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Mad Science
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:30:19 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] grain vs. roughage
  • - Susan Garlinghouse
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] childs trail saddle
  • - Rides 2 Far

    Re: [RC] Mad Science - Susan Garlinghouse


    > I've been told by several ride vets that it's the ratio of body mass to
    > surface area. The determining factor tends not to be the amount of energy
    > produced by the animal but, it's ability to keep the body cool. A horse
    being
    > 15 hands tall and weighing 1200 pounds will probably have the same surface
    > area of a horse 14.2 at 850 pounds.
    
    Nope.  The 1200 lb horse has a body surface area of 6.817 square meters, or
    .00568 square meters of cooling area per pound of body mass.  The 850 pound
    horse has a body surface area of 5.411 square meters, or .00636 square
    meters per pound of body mass.   All other things being equal, the smaller
    horse is 12% more efficient at cooling himself, and in all likelihood, has
    less heat to dissipate to begin with.
    
     Another factor in the equation is the
    > type of muscle that predominately composes the horses anatomy.
    
    True, but if you're referring to the Tevis data, 95% of the horses had 50%
    or more Arabian blood, generally of very similar muscle fiber type
    populations, so that was effectively cancelled out as a variability.
    
    Susan G
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    [RC] Mad Science, JUDYK89
    Re: [RC] Mad Science, Susan Garlinghouse
    Re: [RC] Mad Science, Truman Prevatt
    Re: [RC] Mad Science, Susan Garlinghouse
    Re: [RC] Mad Science, Truman Prevatt
    Re: [RC] Mad Science, Joe Long
    Re: [RC] Mad Science, Rob