RE: [RC] What Constitutes a Start? - Steph Teeter
>>
says Truman: Using your logic and drawing from this particular incident
where the
party was seen about five miles into the ride then every RM in the
country could just set up a point 5 miles down the trail and let all
those that for whatever reason didn't want to go on pull from the ride
without any record. If 5 is okay, then why is 10 or 15 or 20? Are you
telling me you think this is in the letter and/or sprit of the AERC rules?
>>
No, I think it is a pretty standard procedure to count anybody that begins
the physical course as a 'starter'. But in order to file a protest or
grievance, you need something more concrete than 'but this isn't the way
it's supposed to be done. '
I'm probably getting myself into deep trouble here ... and I am NOT
promoting the deletion of 'sort of starters' from the official start list.
But I don't see any rules being broken. Just protocol, and maybe a 'by
default' policy. I don't see that there is anything concrete to be
protested.
Steph
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Replies
-
- Re: [RC] What Constitutes a Start?, Truman Prevatt
|
|