<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] [RC] Trimming your own horse's feet
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:29:52 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] [RC] Trimming your own horse's feet
  • - Heidi Smith
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Encouragement
  • - Diane

    Re: [RC] [RC] Trimming your own horse's feet - Rob


    >Kat Swigert Wrote:
    >You cannot evaluate soundness in a dead horse....and....get
    >this....it is a serious mistake to think that it can be told how lame a
    
    >horse is by looking at the condition of the bony column and tendons of
    >its legs.
    
    Not only do I have photographs proving the above statement to be wrong
    but, I also carry the reassembled bones of that leg with me where ever I
    go for demonstrative and educational purposes further proving the above
    statement to be false.
    
    >Kat Swigert Wrote:
    >As an example, MY horse was sent to the El Monte rendering plant after
    >he was put down from breaking his leg (his humerus, so THAT part of his
    
    >leg wouldn't have been sent with his feet)
    
    We didn't just get the foot, We got the whole leg. It's very possible,
    more than likely probable, your horse didn't have any crippling changes
    in the bony collumn of the leg. Lastly horses don't have feet, they walk
    on their toe nails, we as humans refer to them as hooves! The cofin bone
    is suspended from the hoofwall by the laminae. The sole of the hoof
    doesn't bear, nor is it designed to bear weight, it meerly covers the
    venus plexus surrounding the cofin bone on the underside of the hoof.
    
    >Kat Swigert Wrote:
    >There is no way that the El Monte rendering plant could have known
    >anything about how my horse was shod during his life and there
    certainly
    >was no way that they could have known anything about the type of
    >training that the horse's farrier had.
    
    The rendering plant just allowed the people conducting the study to look
    at the horses teeth to approximate the age of the animal, and then to
    cut the legs off the animal. They didn't need to know how your horse was
    shod. The type of training your farrier had wasn't the issue as most
    farrier institutes teach pretty much along the same guidelines. Those
    guidelines coincide with the testing parameters of the AFA (American
    Farriers Association), The testing parameters of the AFA pretty much
    follow the shoeing proceedures as outlined in the United States Cavalry
    Horseshoeing Manual. (Written about 100 years ago) So it's probably safe
    to assume that you have a pretty good idea of the level of training the
    farrier recieved. The question at hand was the level of competancy the
    farrier was operating at. Which can probably be associated with the
    level of training he recieved but, not nesessarily always the case.
    
    >Kat Swigert Wrote:
    >You cannot evaluate soundness in a dead horse....and....get
    >this....it is a serious mistake to think that it can be told how lame a
    
    >horse is by looking at the condition of the bony column and tendons of
    >its legs. As an example, MY horse was sent to the El Monte rendering
    plant after
    >he was put down from breaking his leg.
    
     Anybody with the ability needed to empty a glass of water could have
    probably diagnosed the extent of lameness of your horse at the time it
    was put down, as well as the cause of it being put down. Without any
    anatomy related training or without even dissecting the leg. The cause
    of the fracture especially that far up the leg would not have been
    attributed to shoeing practices. The condition of the structures in the
    lower leg would further prove that.
    
    >Kat Swigert Wrote:
    >And while the condition of the horse's legs and shoes MAY tell you
    >something about the competency of the person (or people, since most
    >horses will have many more than just one shoer in their lives)
    providing
    >the care, it will tell you absolutely nothing about if, how, or by whom
    
    >they were trained.
    
    This statement was never part of the study conducted. The study was to
    try and determine how many horses died before the average usefull
    lifespan of the horse due to poor horseshoeing practices. Whether they
    were euthanised, or sent to slaughter, or even purchased by a
    Killer/Dealer and then hauled to Texas where they were slaughtered for
    human consumption and exported to Europe and Japan.
    
    
    
    Rob
    
    Rob Kalb
    Rob's Equine Hoof Care
    Phelan CA
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    [RC] [RC] Trimming your own horse's feet, Rob