Ridecamp: Re: [RC] More Thoughts- and those going away

In a message dated Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:00:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, roger@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

I meant to respond to the other post but accidentally deleted and then could not find it again.  Really Roger, it was accidental...I don't know how to cut and paste very well so here goes........mb

> MOST of the time I bring up issues such as I have presented here on
> RC to the BOD and they are are ignored. go figure?

And this is the way is always is.
> 
> 
 they are
> truly concerned about repercussions if they spoke up.

Repercussions by who?
> 
> We will never see the 2 VC rule or the 2 VET rule added to our rules.

I don't think the 2 VC rule should be a rule.  As far as 2 vets, most rides do have two vets.


> Or another I left out - the vet license issue. That is vets without a
> license to practice,  vetting a ride, and maybe treating a horse.

Now, Roger, you know Courtney and I and others argued long and loud to the BOD to no avail.
> 
> Never will the issues of hazing be addressed, since one HAS to make
> I have no problem with mild hazing.  Remember, I rode Scarlett O'Hara and mules don't always do with you want, despite adequate training.

> Remember the bashing from last year with the new rider - with the
> horse that died?
> Has anyone seen any changes to address that?  Many demands were made
> from this list. The rider is still running(racing) - I think?

Not true, the rider has not been seen again to my knowledge.  The idiot that trained and advised her still is but I guess that cannot be helped.....
> 
> Maryben


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=