<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] MFT vs. TWH
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:25:22 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Fwd: [RC] Equine dental care
  • - JUDYK89
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] FW: ride Colorado
  • - Linda B. Merims

    Re: [RC] MFT vs. TWH - Milinda Ellis


    Ray,
    
    I'll cover your back.  I have no experience with MFTs but have TWHs.  I ride
    them and they're also my broodmares.
    
    Anyway,  I went out with Linda Parrish yesterday (I'm a bad person -- we
    dusted her and Flash when we were supposed to stay with her).  Again:
    Sorry, Linda!  We really DID think we could out-run those horse flies!
    
    My experience has been this:  You *can* cover rough ground quickly on a TWH,
    and do it quite well.  I did yesterday and haven't ridden over [pock-marked]
    terrain like that in quite awhile (like, several years...).  She alternately
    walked (as suited me and the others I was riding with, except her stride is
    so long she needed to stay in front), RW'd,  and trotted as the
    mood/terrain/horse flies suited her.  Even trotting, it's more smooth than
    non-gaited and rhythmic enough to post (we're going to start jumping
    practice because I also foxhunt this particular mare).  Even in areas where
    there were deep horseprints in dried mud set like concrete, she never made a
    misstep -- even at speed.  Now, while I don't condone hauling butt through
    stuff like that, I'm really glad she could in case the need ever arose.  The
    thing I really like is she didn't start crow hopping no matter how many
    747-sized horse flies were on us.  A rodeo rider I ain't!  Give me a
    laid-back attitude any day of the week...
    
    Milinda Ellis
    Beargrass Cleveland Bays
    Jewett, Texas
    milinda@xxxxxxxxxxx
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ridecamp Guest" <guest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:59 AM
    Subject: [RC] MFT vs. TWH
    
    
    Ray O'Donohue rno2m@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        This is a loaded question! As a field trial rider,I have a experience
    with only one MFT,but have ridden a lot of TWH's.Bear in mind that many
    TWh's rarely or never give a Rw.My MFT does about five or more
    gaits,depending on...whatever.If i were getting a new horse for trials,or
    endurance,I would look for a TWH with a pronounced head nod:if he ain't
    nodding his head,he is doing some other gait than a RunningWalk.The reason
    you want a true RunningWalk,and this is in my opinion key to the whole
    gaited horse advantage re "high average speed in rough terrain" is that it
    gives a seamless transition up into a lope/canter and back down into the
    running walk.A good TWH can,at a RW   jamdownhill across gullies in rocky
    and muddy terrain with wonderful safety.My MFT cannot!and he is very heavy
    on the forehand.I don't know how pronounced the heavy forehand problem is in
    other MFT's ;i have been told that "many" are that way.The Fox Trot gait as
    such does not lend itself to rough terrain as well as the RW.I'm starting to
    believe that NO gait,including the square trot of the typical non-gaited
    horse is as good for quick travel in very rough terrain strewn with hazards
    as a good RW.
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net,
    http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    [RC] MFT vs. TWH, Ridecamp Guest