Check it Out!     |
[Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
[Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
Thanks to all who responded to my question about subtracting vet check hold times from total allowed time to complete an endurance ride. I agree it is tricky to fit this concept into a realistic frame, considering it could keep vets and staff tied up longer sometimes. I believe this idea needs some more discussion. Ed's thoughts about considering a minimum speed may be good starting point. It is going to be hard to figure the difference between the challenges of a difficult ride that may need more hold time for safety, and those of an unfit horse that might have trouble completing on time. In the case of the LD rides, I have seen riders arrive before the cutoff finish time, but the horse's allowed 30 min recovery time would have been past the 6 hour limit. Don't recall this ever being an issue, but guess it could be. More study. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed & Wendy Hauser" <sisufarm@mmmpcc.org> To: "Heidi Smith" <heidi@sagehillcmk.com>; <ridecamp@endurance.net>; <kninformation@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 6:40 AM Subject: RC: Re: Re: Re: Hold Times In Endurance Rides > > On the other hand it could be logically argued that the time to complete > should be computed by considering a minimum speed for an endurance ride and > then adding the holds onto that speed. For example if 5.5 mph was > considered the minimum trail speed (I just picked UMECRA CTR minimum speed > on a hard course on a hard day) a 100 mile ride with 3 hours of holds: 3 + > 18.18 hours= 21 hours 11 minutes. > > It would change endurance riding, but would be a manageable system. >
    Check it Out!     |