----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:23
PM
Subject: RC: Whips and spurs...an
outsider's perspective
I've been reading the mail on
this, and I must say I'm somewhat astounded that FEI has passed this ruling,
particularly as it has seen fit NOT to pass similar rulings in relation to the
other disciplines.
What I'm about to say may upset
many of you, and I'd like to point out that this is NOT my point of view, and
that I don't endorse it in any way, but I've discussed the ruling with some
folks in other disciplines, and the only "rationale" we can think of for the
FEI's decision, is that, to many people, and particularly to those involved in
other disciplines, endurance riding is still perceived as "yahoo" riding.
To the so-called "purists" of
equestrianism, it is unnecessary to "mess with" long-established sports such
as show-jumping, dressage, and eventing. Indeed, the politics rampant in
those sports would make any attempt to do so highly unlikely to succeed.
However, as endurance is a new sport, and lacks the elitism of the older
disciplines, it is "fair game" to the FEI, which is seeking to show the animal
activists out there that it truly has the best interests of the horse at
heart.
Maybe I'm wrong in my assumption,
but my experience sitting on disciplinary panels makes me think
not.
Any
thoughts?
Tracey