Check it Out!     |
[Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
[Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
Jim: The objective would be two fold. 1. To provide the AERC Membership an authorative compendium of the two sets of rules and to illustrate the similarities as well as the differences. 2. To provide the AERC Board of Directors a compendium of the two sets of rules and to provide, in addition, a basis of combined rules that would satisfy the FEI for the Qualification of US riders for International competition with out disrupting the AERC Ride formwork. Discussion: On the first objective I do believe that a printed comparison would do much to ally the fears of many AERC members who do not understand International Competition. I also believe it would alert many FEI competitors as to where the problem lays at this time. And finally I believe that it is something that the International Committee should have done several years ago instead of trying to set up an elitist level of endurance riding. (and if I am flamed I can support my comments) On the second objective, I cannot believe that the AERC International Committee has just taken the FEI at face value and accepted what has been thrown at them. In the US Endurance is a sport for the common person. In the US the common person is the ultimate. I refer you to Aaron Copeland's "Fanfare for the Common Man", a thrilling tribute to the people in this country. In Europe and the Arabic countries endurance is a sport of the upper level of the population, the not so common man. You will only find fanfares for the elite and royalty. So the second objective will give us (the AERC) a working tool with which to start negotiations with the FEI, if they want us aboard. Bob Morris ps: this is not going to happen over night. I look at several months of work with, I hope, some input from interested persons. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Holland [mailto:lanconn@tds.net] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 10:22 AM To: Bob Morris Cc: RideCamp Subject: Re: Duel Sanctioning Bob: What should be the objective here? To come up with ONE set of rules we can all live with? Generate an AERC rule to override FEI rules? To bring to FEI's attention to the conflicts we are having to deal with to play internationally? What approach do you think we should take? We NEED a resolution to this problem for the good of AERC. I am not opposed to FEI or having our AERC riders complete internationally or even FEI sanctioning of AERC rides....but we all need to all get on the same page. Right now, we're not even in the same book. Personally, my only international aspirations are to go ride with Maryanne Stroud Gabbani! <grin> I salute you for being willing to take this on. I'm outta here...gotta go fly spray the guys and get my ears lowered...or a rabies shot..... :) Jim and Sun of Dimanche Bob Morris wrote: > > Jim: > > What I do believe would work would be a full comparison of AERC Rules and > Regulations vs. the FEI Rules and Regulations. And I mean the full set not > just the FEI Endurance, I mean every thing that governs endurance riding > under FEI. > > > Once the comparison is done and charted I am willing to carry it to the top. > Or better yet start at the top and work down till some one responds. > > Any comments? > > Bob Morris >
    Check it Out!     |