Fw: Re: Re: Please explain NH to me.

["Tracey" <tracey@tbt.co.za>]

>
>>Tracey--Shannon did a great job of explaining it>
>
>Yes, she's good at that :-)  I was hoping that you would explain it to me,
>because you were the one who said I didn't understand it.
>
>
>>and of course I ask why---to everything...which is HOW I figure out what
>parts of Natural Horsemanship work for me and and what parts don't.>
>
>
>Glad to hear it.  I've seen loads of NH "groupies" doing far too many
things
>without bothering to question, because, at the moment, NH is very
>fashionable.
>
>
>>You can over-immerse yourself in anything>
>
>
>Except chocolate!
>
>>.immersion by itself is a good thing if you keep the blinders off.>
>
>And as long as you don't have blind obedience.  Except to chocolate.
>
>
>>Did I "complain" because you rejected it???? Nope!  I don't care if you
>reject it or not...makes no never-mind to me!>
>
>
>No, you didn't complain, and I don't believe I complained about anything
you
>said, either, did I, San?
>
>
>Perhaps I have been a bit harsh about NH.  I'd be less skeptical if the
guys
>promoting it were a little less "mysterious" in their delivery, and a
little
>more accepting that what they're promoting is nothing more than common
sense
>(but as I'm a skeptic at heart, I doubt it :-))  I also get a bit peeved
>because so many people attend these clinics and then go home, try it with
>their horses and fail.  They then blame themselves / blame the horses - the
>NH guy usually says they're doing something wrong.  It's not WRONG, it's
>just wrong for that horse.
>
>
>I just wish more people would listen to their horses, rather than some chap
>standing in a pen, asking $50,00 per head, is all.
>
>
>Tracey
>
>
>
>