Check it Out!     |
[Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] |
[Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Author Index] | [Subject Index] |
----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Bloxsom <cyclone@snet.net> To: <KSwigart87@alumni.gsb.columbia.edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 8:32 AM Subject: Re: Training Ride > > I said: > > > > "If you ride > > a horse correctly, and use your hands and legs effectively, > > ALL horses, > > Arabs and otherwise will reflexively assume a round frame. > > It's not about training, it's about riding right." > > > Kat said: > > > Ummm.... This isn't entirely correct. Some horses (and > > modern arabians are particularly prone to this) are > > conformationally unsuited to being able to round their > > backs. And some horses are so far gone down the "upside > > down" training road that getting them back underneath > > themselves is nigh on close to impossible. > > > Well, perhaps I should have said "... they will assume a round frame to the > extent that they are conformationally able ... " but no, that doesn't stop > them from coming onto the bit when the hands and legs are used properly. > Even the hollow-built Arabs. The horses I've used a running martingale on > were: > > 1) quarter horse, BADLY mis-ridden. head tosser/star gazer. 3 weeks in a > martingale > > 2) arab/QH, spoiled. goes hollow. use a RM on trail for riders who don't > know how to ride well enough. uses none in a lesson. > > 3) another one like #2, arab. > > -Abby >
    Check it Out!     |