Fwd: RC: Oakland Hills

[Endure4fun@aol.com]

In a message dated 7/1/00 8:32:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
phonebunnyjk@yahoo.com writes:

<<  He didn't die because he was overridden, he died because he fell off a 
mountain. Again, facts, you need facts.
  >>

would he fallen down the ravine in rider was taking it easy on curves?  or 
was he bombing down trail so he could be first?
k

---- Begin included message ----

• To: ridecamp@endurance.net
• Subject: RC: Oakland Hills
• From: jennifer kurtzhall <phonebunnyjk@yahoo.com>
• Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
• Old-Return-Path: <phonebunnyjk@yahoo.com>
• Resent-Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
• Resent-From: ridecamp@endurance.net
• Resent-Message-ID: <GRThSC.A.urF.TfrX5@seahorse.fsr.com>
• Resent-Sender: ridecamp-request@endurance.net

I've been reading about this thing for two days now, I've read about "tar and feathers" banning, regulations, lemon awards, etc. etc. Has anyone stopped and really thought about the fact that this horse fell down a #@%&% ravine? I saw this ravine, it was straight down, basically over a cliff. I am in no way defending this rider, but what did the horse die of??? Internal wounds? Colic?? What? He didn't die because he was overridden, he died because he fell off a mountain. Again, facts, you need facts.

Jennifer Kurtzhall 

---

Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.

---- End included message ----