Re: RC: Re: Getting Pulled

[Teresa Van Hove <tvanhove@uswest.net>]

David LeBlanc wrote:
> 
> But if the rider is ill, or maybe injured from a fall, who is going to vet
> the horse through?  A stranger?
Ride volunteers are happy to do this if a rider has a 
bad ankle, knee, whatever and wants to keep riding, dont
see any differnce for a rider that would not go on after
the vet check so this is not a valid arguement against
a requirement for passing a vet check before allowing RO.  

Teresa 

> At 09:59 PM 4/28/00 -0500, Becky Huffman wrote:
> >I think in order to have a "RO", the horse should have to pass the vet exam
> >and be cleared to continue.
> >